Insurance Disputes in the UAE: A Practical Overview

Insurance disputes form a significant part of commercial and consumer litigation in the United Arab Emirates. As the insurance market has expanded alongside rapid economic growth, infrastructure development and population increase, disagreements over coverage, claim handling and quantum have become more frequent. Recent events, including the severe flooding of April 2024, generated a notable volume of property, construction and motor claims, many of which turned on the interpretation of flood and catastrophe exclusions or business interruption wording.

Legal and Regulatory Framework

The onshore insurance sector (outside the financial free zones) is primarily regulated by Federal Decree-Law No. 48 of 2023 on the Regulation of Insurance Activities (and subsequent updates, including references in practice to Federal Decree-Law No. 6 of 2025). Regulatory oversight of insurance companies was transferred to the Central Bank of the UAE (CBUAE). Insurance contracts themselves are governed by the UAE Civil Transactions Law (Civil Code), particularly the provisions dealing with insurance contracts. These emphasise the principle of utmost good faith (uberrimae fidei), requiring full and accurate disclosure by both parties.

A three-year limitation period generally applies to claims arising from insurance contracts, running from the date of the insured event or the date the claimant became aware of it. Courts often interpret the starting point with reference to formal notification of the loss or the insurer’s rejection of the claim.

Arbitration clauses in insurance policies face strict formal requirements. Under the Civil Code (as reaffirmed in recent case law and the updated Civil Transactions Law), an arbitration agreement contained only in the general printed conditions of a policy is typically void unless it appears in a separate special agreement signed by the parties. Onshore courts respect valid arbitration agreements but apply a rigorous test to their formation.

Common Causes of Disputes

The most frequent drivers of insurance disputes in the UAE are:

  1. Coverage interpretation which includes whether a particular loss falls within the insuring clause and the application of exclusions, sub-limits and deductibles.
  2. Non-disclosure or misrepresentation especially material facts that would have influenced underwriting or premium.
  3. Late or defective notification for failure to comply with policy time limits or conditions precedent.
  4. Quantum and valuation disputes and disagreement over the amount of loss or the method of assessment (particularly common in motor and property claims).
  5. Policy conditions and warranties which include alleged breaches of maintenance, security or other obligations.

Motor, property, construction, marine and increasingly, cyber insurance generate the highest volumes of disputes. Health insurance claims frequently involve pre-authorisation denials or disputes over medical necessity and network restrictions.

Dispute Resolution Mechanism

For onshore insurance disputes (in the absence of a valid arbitration agreement), a mandatory multi-stage process applies.

  1. Complaint to the insurer:
    The insured or beneficiary must first submit a formal written complaint to the insurance company. The insurer is generally required to respond within a defined period (commonly 15–30 business or calendar days, depending on the applicable rules and the type of claim).
  2. Escalation to Sanadak:
    If the matter remains unresolved, the complainant may refer the dispute to Sanadak, the independent Financial and Insurance Ombudsman Unit established by the CBUAE and operational since March 2024. Sanadak handles complaints from individuals and small and medium-sized enterprises against licensed insurers. It provides an accessible, relatively informal first-tier resolution process.
  3. Insurance Disputes Settlement and Resolution Committee:
    Unresolved matters may be referred to the specialised Insurance Disputes Settlement and Resolution Committee (also administered under the Sanadak framework). The Committee has exclusive jurisdiction over claims by insureds, beneficiaries or affected parties against the insurance company. Proceedings are conducted in Arabic.

Decisions on claims valued at AED 50,000 or less are generally final and immediately enforceable. For higher-value claims, either party may appeal the Committee’s decision directly to the Court of Appeal within 30 days of issuance or notification, bypassing the Court of First Instance. This streamlined appeal route is a deliberate design feature of the current regime.

Failure to follow the statutory sequence can result in a claim being ruled inadmissible by the ordinary courts.

Larger commercial, marine, construction and reinsurance disputes are frequently resolved through arbitration (where a valid clause exists) or in appropriate cases, the DIFC or ADGM courts. Jurisdiction questions between onshore courts and the free-zone courts can be complex, particularly where policies contain Courts of the UAE or Courts of Dubai wording. Recent decisions of the Conflicts of Jurisdiction Tribunal have provided important guidance on these issues.

Key Practical Considerations

Ambiguities in policy wording are generally construed against the insurer under the principle of contra proferentem. Courts and committees examine the specific facts, the proposal form, the policy schedule, endorsements and any surveyor or expert reports. Written reasons for claim rejection are required and unsupported or shifting grounds of declinature can weaken the insurer’s position.

Policyholders should maintain thorough contemporaneous records, give prompt written notice of loss and respond carefully to requests for information. Insurers, for their part, must handle claims in accordance with regulatory standards and the duty of good faith.

Fees apply at the Committee stage (typically a percentage of the claim value subject to minimum and maximum caps). Certain categories of claim including some inter-insurer recoveries, urgent interim measures and pure arbitration matters fall outside the compulsory Sanadak/Committee route.

Conclusion

The UAE has developed a specialised, multi-tiered system for insurance disputes that prioritises early resolution through the insurer and Sanadak before formal adjudication. While the framework provides clearer pathways and specialist expertise than the ordinary courts alone, successful outcomes still depend on careful attention to policy wording, timely notification, complete documentation and the correct procedural route. Both policyholders and insurers benefit from early legal advice, particularly in complex coverage or multi-party situations involving free-zone entities or competing jurisdiction clauses. As regulatory refinements continue and claim volumes evolve with climate, cyber and construction risks, a sound understanding of this specialised regime remains essential for effective dispute management in the UAE insurance market.

Contact Details

Email: admin@bankslegal.com

WhatsApp: +971 55 655 2447

Share

Recent insights
UAE Puts Suspicious Transactions and Freezing of Funds on a Faster Clock
The AI Contract: Who Takes the Risk When the Machine Gets It Wrong?
ADGM’s New Financial Services Licensing Requirements: What Businesses Need to Know

We deliver our services with a focus on quality and achieving impressive resultsOur legal expertise protects your interests and achieves meaningful outcomes. Whether handling litigation, transactions, or asset protection, we are committed to excellence.